We're near the end of the long-dragged-out forced march of another national election season -- though "season" has become a misnomer for a process that now takes well over a year. The main debates are finished -- those two-side televised contests, a lion's share of limelight going to the presidential contenders, a healthy share taken by their sidekick cubs, with scraps, offal, trimmings, and marrowless bones left for the publicity-starved third-party debaters to wrest away or share -- whatever they may decide. I must register my partial relief now that the debates are finished -- merely partial though, because it takes almost no time in our media-saturated environment for the assessments of these back and forth staged deliberative discussions to proliferate.
And, it actually would not be that bad if in fact most of what passes for commentary actually did comprise something like "assessments" -- even admittedly biased ones. What is so galling, so irritating, and so . . . downright depressing is the spectacle, repeated almost endlessly of people I thought I knew better -- and thought more highly of -- blithely in some cases, snidely and smugly in others, and in yet others accompanied by vitriol, rabidity, fear-mongering and ultimatums, engage themselves in what is really just pure partisanship, plain and simple -- all the while concealing that very behavior from themselves, and projecting it onto their political opponents. Not only is there a visible, palpable viciousness (in the general sense) coloring both their filters and their statements -- there's also a distinctively moral slippage, a continued and unmarked failure, a different and more troubling viciousness --expression of which, and encounter with which, is rapidly becoming a nearly unavoidable dimension of everyday existence.
An occasional digest of interesting issues pertaining to, or illuminated by, Virtue Ethics - reflections on classic texts and thinkers of the Virtue Ethics traditions - and more general discussions of matters in Ethics
Showing posts with label faction partisanship and social discord. Show all posts
Showing posts with label faction partisanship and social discord. Show all posts
Oct 31, 2012
Oct 20, 2011
Occupy Wall Street, the Tea Party, and Politics of Anger
A lot has been written and said recently comparing the two mass
political movements essentially based in the politics of anger -- Occupy
Wall Street and the Tea Party. In fact, so much is currently out there
that practically any site I could arbitrarily select to link to here
would fit the bill -- so long as it mentions the two movements in some
comparative manner.
James Sinclair, in Occupy Wall Street vs The Tea Party (where he also sets out one of the more interesting Venn diagrams overlapping the two groups) sets out, summarizes, and links up an excellently balanced set of comparisons.
James Sinclair, in Occupy Wall Street vs The Tea Party (where he also sets out one of the more interesting Venn diagrams overlapping the two groups) sets out, summarizes, and links up an excellently balanced set of comparisons.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
